2025 Casco Bay Ecosystem Monitoring Report

Reports | Feb 12, 2026

Over the last several decades, we've seen dramatic ecosystem changes in the Gulf of Maine. We've observed population spikes and declines, habitat loss and recovery, and the appearance of new species that typically occur in regions to our south.

We are conducting long-term, nearshore monitoring to learn about the pace and direction of these changes in our region. Read on to dive into our key findings.

2025-Annual-Ecosystem-Report-feature-image
Two people pull in a seine net from a beach.
This graphic depicts the monthly shifting of three Gulf Stream indices north and south.
Figure 1. Monthly Gulf Stream Indices derived from subsurface temperature and sea surface height from January 2003 onward, representing the north–south variability of the Gulf Stream. Shown are the T200-based Gulf Stream Index (dark blue), the T200-based Western Gulf Stream Index (teal), and the SSH-based Gulf Stream Index (orange). The T200-based indices are calculated from EN4 subsurface temperature anomalies averaged over the upper 200 m and are available through November 2025, while the SSH-based index, derived from satellite sea surface height anomalies, is available through July 2025. All indices are standardized (zero mean, unit variance) relative to their respective reference periods (1993–2012 for SSH-based; 1954–2018 for T200-based) and plotted as monthly time series.
Figure 2. Heat map of daily SST anomalies from the beginning of 2003 through the end of 2025. Dark reds indicate large warm anomalies, while dark blues indicate large cold anomalies. Years are broken into quarters by season.
Figure 2. Heat map of daily SST anomalies from the beginning of 2003 through the end of 2025. Dark reds indicate large warm anomalies, while dark blues indicate large cold anomalies. Years are broken into quarters by season.
Figure 3. Catch per unit effort (CPUE) per year. Colored portions represent the CPUE of individual species, with species other than the 10 most commonly-caught grouped as “Other.” Overall bar heights represent CPUE for total catch per year, regardless of species.
Figure 3. Catch per unit effort (CPUE) per year. Colored portions represent the CPUE of individual species, with species other than the 10 most commonly-caught grouped as “Other.” Overall bar heights represent CPUE for total catch per year, regardless of species.
Figure 4. Time series of 2025 Casco Bay nearshore community assemblage, represented by the proportion of the weekly catch collected via beach seine.
Figure 4. Time series of 2025 Casco Bay nearshore community assemblage, represented by the proportion of the weekly catch collected via beach seine. Species that comprised more than 10% of weekly catch are labeled with their abbreviated species name. Green crab (g.crb, light green), mummichog (mchg, teal), and Atlantic silverside (slrsd, purple) were caught throughout the summer. Alewife (alwf, indigo) were common throughout July. Atlantic herring (hrrg, yellow), though usually common in June, were encountered infrequently and in late summer. Other species that infrequently made up a significant portion of weekly catch included pollock (pllck), winter flounder (w.fldr), sculpin spp. (sclpn), rock gunnel (gnnl), and American sand lance (sndln).
Figure 5. “Southern species” (summer flounder, white mullet, Atlantic moonfish, crevalle jack, permit, and spot) relative abundance during CBASS seine survey operations, 2014-2025. The color of the year on the vertical axis indicates whether that year had anomalously warm temperatures (red) or anomalously cool temperatures (blue) as compared to 2003-2020 Portland Harbor Tide Gauge averages. Each colored cell indicates the relative abundance of the fish within the southern species group for one week of the sampling season. Cooler colors (purples and blues) indicate that relatively few fish were caught in that week, while warmer colors (yellows) indicate that relatively many fish were caught. Gray indicates that seine surveys were conducted, but no fish of the specified group were observed.
Figure 5. “Southern species” (summer flounder, white mullet, Atlantic moonfish, crevalle jack, permit, and spot) relative abundance during CBASS seine survey operations, 2014-2025. The color of the year on the vertical axis indicates whether that year had anomalously warm temperatures (red) or anomalously cool temperatures (blue) as compared to 2003-2020 Portland Harbor Tide Gauge averages. Each colored cell indicates the relative abundance of the fish within the southern species group for one week of the sampling season. Cooler colors (purples and blues) indicate that relatively few fish were caught in that week, while warmer colors (yellows) indicate that relatively many fish were caught. Gray indicates that seine surveys were conducted, but no fish of the specified group were observed.
Figure 6. a) Partial effect of year on green crab catch per unit effort (CPUE; average number of crabs caught per seine haul). b) Partial effect of mean sea surface temperature in June two years prior on green crab CPUE. c) Partial effect of mean sea surface temperature in the previous November on green crab CPUE. For all plots, labeled points represent observations relevant to green crab CPUE in the indicated year, black lines indicate modeled relationships produced with Generalized Additive Models, and shaded regions represent 95% confidence intervals.
Figure 6. a) Partial effect of year on green crab catch per unit effort (CPUE; average number of crabs caught per seine haul). b) Partial effect of mean sea surface temperature in June two years prior on green crab CPUE. c) Partial effect of mean sea surface temperature in the previous November on green crab CPUE. For all plots, labeled points represent observations relevant to green crab CPUE in the indicated year, black lines indicate modeled relationships produced with Generalized Additive Models, and shaded regions represent 95% confidence intervals.

2025 seemed to be a very different year in the coastal Gulf of Maine. This was observed across a number of our long-term monitoring programs, most notably our marine invasive species monitoring program (MIMIC), as well as in our trapping/monitoring efforts for the newly arrived blue crab. 2025 marked the first summer that we were unable to capture any crabs in the Webhannet River System since they were discovered in 2020. And reports from our partner organizations trapping in different systems reported the same. This past summer was also a very slow year for invasive species at our 17 long-term monitoring sites in southern coastal Maine/Casco Bay. 2025 marked the first season on record where the "abundant" ranking (described as "almost everywhere you look") was never used for our tunicate populations at these sites. As the photos show (Figure 7), fouling of kelp by both solitary and colonial tunicates (aka sea squirts) was a serious issue in years past (specifically 2022 – 2024); however, this summer and fall, we observed a lot of beautifully clean and healthy kelp fronds at the same sites where kelp was almost completely covered in previous years. And although samples are still being processed, to date, we have not seen any "Gulf Stream Orphans" or southern species in our monthly larval fish collections from 2025.

Jeremy Miller Research Associate Wells National Estuarine Research Reserve
Figure 7. Top: biofouling of kelp by invasive tunicates in 2018, 2022, and 2024. Bottom: marked reduction in biofouling in 2025 at various sites in Casco Bay (photos Courtesy of Jeremy Miller, Wells NERR).
Figure 7. Top: biofouling of kelp by invasive tunicates in 2018, 2022, and 2024. Bottom: marked reduction in biofouling in 2025 at various sites in Casco Bay (photos Courtesy of Jeremy Miller, Wells NERR).

After observing steady declines in eelgrass density and aboveground biomass (percent cover) since we started SCUBA monitoring of Portland area eelgrass beds in 2018, 2025 offered some hope. Over the duration of DEP Marine Unit monitoring from June to September 2025 and as compared to 2024, our staff observed a small increase in the distribution and aboveground biomass of eelgrass at two of our three sites, one off East End Beach and the other on the northwest side of Fort Gorges, including the presence of small eelgrass patches near the historic deep edge of the beds. Continuous temperature data were observed to closely correlate with eelgrass presence and distribution, with cooler sites presenting more eelgrass tissue, including shoots with less algal fouling.

Angie Brewer Marine Unit Leader Maine Department of Environmental Protection
Figure 8. Measuring eelgrass cover in Casco Bay (photo courtesy of Angie Brewer, Maine DEP).
Figure 8. Measuring eelgrass cover in Casco Bay (photo courtesy of Angie Brewer, Maine DEP).
Atlantic Puffins near Egg Rock.
Atlantic puffins are one of the most charismatic colonial nesting seabirds in the Gulf of Maine. Although relatively rare in Casco Bay, other species like Common terns can serve similar roles as ecosystem indicators.
Figure 9. Mussel bed presence derived from acoustic transects completed in 2025 in Western Casco Bay. Surveyed areas include a) near the mouth of the Presumpscot River and b) near the mouth of the Royal River. Green points indicate ground-truthed subtidal mussel beds, and gray points indicate unidentified habitat unlikely to contain live mussels.
Figure 9. Mussel bed presence derived from acoustic transects completed in 2025 in Western Casco Bay. Surveyed areas include a) near the mouth of the Presumpscot River and b) near the mouth of the Royal River. Green points indicate ground-truthed subtidal mussel beds, and gray points indicate unidentified habitat unlikely to contain live mussels.

Read more